Neither interest nor identity theory fully be aware of the normative transnational legal process. Engagement in the transnational legal process helps constitute the identity of the state is one that obeys regulations, but what is critical is the interaction, not the label that purports to spot circumstances as open-handed or not. Partly, act as obey international law as a result of repeated interaction with other governmental and non-governmental actresses in the international system. Properties violation of law creates inevitable frictions and contradictions that hinder its ongoing engagement within a transnational legal process. When a developing nation defaults on the sovereign debt, on-line impairs its capacity secure new lending. The nation's leaders may shift over time for a policy violation of international law to at least one of concurrence to avoid such frictions in its continuing associations.
As transnational actresses interact, they create patterns of behaviour and generate norms of external conduct that they in turn internalise. Extradition treaty non-compliance by the US Law-abiding states internalise international law by incorporating it into their domestic legal and political structures, executive action, legislation, and judicial decisions which take account of any corporate international norms. Nations also takes action to other states reputations as law-abiding or not. Legal ideologies prevail among domestic decision-makers such that they are affected by ideas that their actions are against the law, or that domestic opponents or other nations in the global program also categorise them. Moreover, domestic decision-making becomes enmeshed with international legal norms, as institutional arrangements with the making and maintenance of an international commitment become entrenched in domestic legal and political processes. It is through this repeated process of interaction and internalisation of international law requires its stickiness as it is known, that nation states acquire their identity, and that nations to find promoting the rule of international law as part of a national self-interest. It is important to understand that although at times international law seems a weak, the reality is that nations use the rhetoric of international law for their own purposes at any particular time to vindicate their political position.